| Free Article |
Portfolio Forensics--Walking Through a Portfolio Review
by David Van Knapp, author of
SENSIBLE STOCK INVESTING:
How to Pick, Value, and Manage Stocks
and
THE TOP 40 DIVIDEND STOCKS FOR 2010:
How to Generate Wealth or Income from Dividend Stocks
September, 2010
From time to time, one runs across pointless arguments about whether buy-and-
hold is dead. Most long-term stock holders know that buy-and-hold really
means buy-and-monitor, or buy-and-homework, or some similar phrase that
indicates that reasons can arise to sell a long-term holding. The days of the
dying grandfather telling his family “Never sell the AT&T” are long gone. While
the ideal might be to hold each stock “forever,” life happens, and in doing so it
can create reasons to sell any stock.
How do you decide? I advocate periodic Portfolio Reviews. In my Dividend
Growth Portfolio, which is devoted to dividend growth stocks and does not
require real close attention, I aim to conduct a review twice per year. The point
is to impose upon yourself the discipline to really examine your stock portfolio
periodically, apply standards designed to reveal whether each stock still deserves
a place in your portfolio, and take action on what you find out.
In my Dividend Portfolio, normally the presumption is that each dividend stock
will not be sold. But that presumption can be overcome. During a Portfolio
Review, the burden shifts to the company to prove why it should be kept. Here
are some of the questions I ask:
• What is its yield on cost (YOC)? I don’t penalize a dividend growth
stock solely because its current yield may have dropped below qualifying levels.
That may be only because the stock’s price has jumped way up. If I purchased
it years ago, and I am still satisfied with how it is growing its dividend, the
reliability of the dividend, etc., I normally would keep it. It is doing its job. By
the way, the formula for YOC is: Yield on Cost = (Current Yield x Current
Price) / Acquisition Price. An equivalent formula is Last 12 Months’ Dividends
/ Acquisition Price.
• Should some profits be taken? If the company’s price has
skyrocketed, that may present an opportunity to cash out some or all of it and
purchase another stock selling at a better price and offering a higher yield. The
goal would be to have the total dividend stream increase after the transactions
are completed. Notice that if you have held a stock a long time, its current yield
may be low but its YOC may be quite high, difficult to match with a new
purchase.
• Is the safety of its dividend in question? As soon as BP’s oil rig blew
up, the safety of its dividend became perilous for anyone who thought about it.
In a Portfolio Review, update your information on each company and give
serious thought to the ongoing reliability of its dividend.
• Is there a chance to improve your portfolio by making a stock
swap? There are various ways to improve your portfolio, such as increasing its
total yield, increasing the rate of dividend growth, diversifying it, and so on. As
to increasing yield, note the discussion above (second bullet) about making sure
that the initial yield on a new purchase would exceed the YOC of the stock you
would sell. If it wouldn’t, it’s hard to justify the swap. A higher expected rate of
increase may tip the scales.
• Did the company cut or freeze its dividend? If so, it is subject to
immediate examination. You will probably decide to sell most stocks that cut or
freeze their dividend. The main goal of my Dividend Portfolio is to deliver an
ever-increasing dividend stream, so obviously a cut or freeze hurts that goal.
Also, a cut or freeze often portends a price drop. Confident management teams
adhere to established dividend-growth patterns. A company that cuts or freezes
its dividend is conserving cash for some reason. Find out why. The company
may be in difficulty, and its price may be in for a drop too. Selling early usually
brings in the most money you will be able to get for that stock for a long time to
come.
• Has the company’s current yield risen above 10 percent? If so, it is
subject to immediate review, but this is not an automatic reason to sell. An
extremely high yield is usually the result of an extremely low price. Find out
why the market has devalued the stock. It may be a clue that the company is
having major problems, and upon examination you may discover that the
dividend itself is in peril. This may be dividends’ equivalent of a “dead-cat
bounce” in price.
• Has the rate of growth of the dividend taken a turn for the worse?
Can you figure out why? Many dividend investors regard dividend growth as a
key indicator of future prospects, because it reflects management’s view of and
confidence in the next few years, often based upon information available to
them but not to you.
Let’s look at some examples. Here is how these principles played out for six
stocks in a recent Portfolio Review of my Dividend Portfolio.
Abbott Labs (ABT): I own two slugs, purchased in 2008 and 2009. Their
yields on cost are 3.2% and 3.7%, respectively. Abbott increased its dividend
10% this year. The stock is working fine. Decision: Hold
Alliant Energy: Initiated position early in 2010, and it has worked out well. The
stock has a 9% price increase and a 4.9% YOC after a 5% dividend hike this
year. Decision: Hold.
Diageo (DEO): I bought this in 2008. Diageo is a foreign stock (Britain), and
like many foreign stocks, it does not adhere to a predictable dividend-raising
schedule. It makes two payments per year, and the first payment is typically
less than the second payment, making the total year’s dividend impossible to
predict. In its native currency, Diageo has been a steady dividend raiser, but
with varying exchange rates, that has sometimes translated into fewer $US, as if
it had cut its dividend. Too many headaches to keep track of, despite the
company’s strengths. My position was small, and I had a 14% long-term price
gain on the stock. Decision: Sell and put the money to work elsewhere.
Emerson Electric (EMR): Also purchased in 2008, EMR has disappointed
lately with small dividend increases, just 2% in 2010. Its 2.7% yield on cost
(YOC) was pulling the portfolio’s YOC down. Last year, I put it on sort of
probation, sticking a 10% trailing sell-stop under it. It survived by steadily
moving up in price from what had been a significant capital loss. After nearly
hitting the breakeven point, its price began to weaken again. The lousy dividend
increase motivated me to put a tighter stop under it (5%), which it hit a couple
of weeks later. Decision: Put tight stop under it; the stop was hit, so stock
sold.
McDonalds (MCD): Purchased in 2008 and again in 2009. YOC is 3.7% and
4.1% respectively. Blended price increase is more than 20%. Raised its dividend
26% in 2009; awaiting 2010’s increase (which typically comes with the final
payment of the year). What’s not to like? Decision: Hold.
Royal Bank of Canada (RY): Purchased in 2008, the stock survived the
financial crisis and is a solid, stable bank. But it has not increased its dividend
since 2008. I decided to put this small position’s money to work elsewhere.
Decision: Sell.
The Dividend Portfolio contained 12 stocks when I did the Portfolio Review.
The 3 sells mentioned above are a little misleading, because I want to show
examples of reasons to sell. Those were the only 3 sales resulting from this
review. The other 9 stocks were held. In dollar terms, there is typically less than
10% turnover per year in this portfolio. Sometimes there is none.
A good practice is to keep a Shopping List ready—stocks that will help improve
your portfolio in some way and that meet all your criteria for buying a stock.
For my Dividend Growth Portfolio, I use my latest e-book on dividend
investing, The Top 40 Dividend Stocks of [Year] (see a description here), as
my Shopping List. I make sure to update the information, especially any target’s
yield and valuation, before making any purchase. With the proceeds from the 2
immediate sales, I increased my stake in Alliant Energy. At a current yield of
4.5%, that gave a nice boost to the portfolio’s overall YOC (which was 4.1%).
When Emerson Electric hit its sell-stop, I used those proceeds to initiate a
position in Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), whose price seems depressed, at a 3.6%
initial yield. I was pleased to see that Warrren Buffett—through Berkshire
Hathaway (BRK)—had made JNJ his single largest stock purchase in Q2,
adding 17 million shares to the 24 million he already owned, spending about $1
billion on the purchase. I picked up 50 shares myself. What the hell. Always
glad to be in agreement with Mr. Buffett.
by David Van Knapp, author of
SENSIBLE STOCK INVESTING:
How to Pick, Value, and Manage Stocks
and
THE TOP 40 DIVIDEND STOCKS FOR 2010:
How to Generate Wealth or Income from Dividend Stocks
September, 2010
From time to time, one runs across pointless arguments about whether buy-and-
hold is dead. Most long-term stock holders know that buy-and-hold really
means buy-and-monitor, or buy-and-homework, or some similar phrase that
indicates that reasons can arise to sell a long-term holding. The days of the
dying grandfather telling his family “Never sell the AT&T” are long gone. While
the ideal might be to hold each stock “forever,” life happens, and in doing so it
can create reasons to sell any stock.
How do you decide? I advocate periodic Portfolio Reviews. In my Dividend
Growth Portfolio, which is devoted to dividend growth stocks and does not
require real close attention, I aim to conduct a review twice per year. The point
is to impose upon yourself the discipline to really examine your stock portfolio
periodically, apply standards designed to reveal whether each stock still deserves
a place in your portfolio, and take action on what you find out.
In my Dividend Portfolio, normally the presumption is that each dividend stock
will not be sold. But that presumption can be overcome. During a Portfolio
Review, the burden shifts to the company to prove why it should be kept. Here
are some of the questions I ask:
• What is its yield on cost (YOC)? I don’t penalize a dividend growth
stock solely because its current yield may have dropped below qualifying levels.
That may be only because the stock’s price has jumped way up. If I purchased
it years ago, and I am still satisfied with how it is growing its dividend, the
reliability of the dividend, etc., I normally would keep it. It is doing its job. By
the way, the formula for YOC is: Yield on Cost = (Current Yield x Current
Price) / Acquisition Price. An equivalent formula is Last 12 Months’ Dividends
/ Acquisition Price.
• Should some profits be taken? If the company’s price has
skyrocketed, that may present an opportunity to cash out some or all of it and
purchase another stock selling at a better price and offering a higher yield. The
goal would be to have the total dividend stream increase after the transactions
are completed. Notice that if you have held a stock a long time, its current yield
may be low but its YOC may be quite high, difficult to match with a new
purchase.
• Is the safety of its dividend in question? As soon as BP’s oil rig blew
up, the safety of its dividend became perilous for anyone who thought about it.
In a Portfolio Review, update your information on each company and give
serious thought to the ongoing reliability of its dividend.
• Is there a chance to improve your portfolio by making a stock
swap? There are various ways to improve your portfolio, such as increasing its
total yield, increasing the rate of dividend growth, diversifying it, and so on. As
to increasing yield, note the discussion above (second bullet) about making sure
that the initial yield on a new purchase would exceed the YOC of the stock you
would sell. If it wouldn’t, it’s hard to justify the swap. A higher expected rate of
increase may tip the scales.
• Did the company cut or freeze its dividend? If so, it is subject to
immediate examination. You will probably decide to sell most stocks that cut or
freeze their dividend. The main goal of my Dividend Portfolio is to deliver an
ever-increasing dividend stream, so obviously a cut or freeze hurts that goal.
Also, a cut or freeze often portends a price drop. Confident management teams
adhere to established dividend-growth patterns. A company that cuts or freezes
its dividend is conserving cash for some reason. Find out why. The company
may be in difficulty, and its price may be in for a drop too. Selling early usually
brings in the most money you will be able to get for that stock for a long time to
come.
• Has the company’s current yield risen above 10 percent? If so, it is
subject to immediate review, but this is not an automatic reason to sell. An
extremely high yield is usually the result of an extremely low price. Find out
why the market has devalued the stock. It may be a clue that the company is
having major problems, and upon examination you may discover that the
dividend itself is in peril. This may be dividends’ equivalent of a “dead-cat
bounce” in price.
• Has the rate of growth of the dividend taken a turn for the worse?
Can you figure out why? Many dividend investors regard dividend growth as a
key indicator of future prospects, because it reflects management’s view of and
confidence in the next few years, often based upon information available to
them but not to you.
Let’s look at some examples. Here is how these principles played out for six
stocks in a recent Portfolio Review of my Dividend Portfolio.
Abbott Labs (ABT): I own two slugs, purchased in 2008 and 2009. Their
yields on cost are 3.2% and 3.7%, respectively. Abbott increased its dividend
10% this year. The stock is working fine. Decision: Hold
Alliant Energy: Initiated position early in 2010, and it has worked out well. The
stock has a 9% price increase and a 4.9% YOC after a 5% dividend hike this
year. Decision: Hold.
Diageo (DEO): I bought this in 2008. Diageo is a foreign stock (Britain), and
like many foreign stocks, it does not adhere to a predictable dividend-raising
schedule. It makes two payments per year, and the first payment is typically
less than the second payment, making the total year’s dividend impossible to
predict. In its native currency, Diageo has been a steady dividend raiser, but
with varying exchange rates, that has sometimes translated into fewer $US, as if
it had cut its dividend. Too many headaches to keep track of, despite the
company’s strengths. My position was small, and I had a 14% long-term price
gain on the stock. Decision: Sell and put the money to work elsewhere.
Emerson Electric (EMR): Also purchased in 2008, EMR has disappointed
lately with small dividend increases, just 2% in 2010. Its 2.7% yield on cost
(YOC) was pulling the portfolio’s YOC down. Last year, I put it on sort of
probation, sticking a 10% trailing sell-stop under it. It survived by steadily
moving up in price from what had been a significant capital loss. After nearly
hitting the breakeven point, its price began to weaken again. The lousy dividend
increase motivated me to put a tighter stop under it (5%), which it hit a couple
of weeks later. Decision: Put tight stop under it; the stop was hit, so stock
sold.
McDonalds (MCD): Purchased in 2008 and again in 2009. YOC is 3.7% and
4.1% respectively. Blended price increase is more than 20%. Raised its dividend
26% in 2009; awaiting 2010’s increase (which typically comes with the final
payment of the year). What’s not to like? Decision: Hold.
Royal Bank of Canada (RY): Purchased in 2008, the stock survived the
financial crisis and is a solid, stable bank. But it has not increased its dividend
since 2008. I decided to put this small position’s money to work elsewhere.
Decision: Sell.
The Dividend Portfolio contained 12 stocks when I did the Portfolio Review.
The 3 sells mentioned above are a little misleading, because I want to show
examples of reasons to sell. Those were the only 3 sales resulting from this
review. The other 9 stocks were held. In dollar terms, there is typically less than
10% turnover per year in this portfolio. Sometimes there is none.
A good practice is to keep a Shopping List ready—stocks that will help improve
your portfolio in some way and that meet all your criteria for buying a stock.
For my Dividend Growth Portfolio, I use my latest e-book on dividend
investing, The Top 40 Dividend Stocks of [Year] (see a description here), as
my Shopping List. I make sure to update the information, especially any target’s
yield and valuation, before making any purchase. With the proceeds from the 2
immediate sales, I increased my stake in Alliant Energy. At a current yield of
4.5%, that gave a nice boost to the portfolio’s overall YOC (which was 4.1%).
When Emerson Electric hit its sell-stop, I used those proceeds to initiate a
position in Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), whose price seems depressed, at a 3.6%
initial yield. I was pleased to see that Warrren Buffett—through Berkshire
Hathaway (BRK)—had made JNJ his single largest stock purchase in Q2,
adding 17 million shares to the 24 million he already owned, spending about $1
billion on the purchase. I picked up 50 shares myself. What the hell. Always
glad to be in agreement with Mr. Buffett.
| SENSIBLESTOCKS .COM |
| Dedicated to the success of the individual investor |
|
| Click on cover image for description of product |